· Dev  · 1 min read

AI coding assistants in 2025 — speed, context, and cost compared

We re‑tested the top coding assistants with large repos, long instructions, and strict JSON tasks. Here’s who’s fastest and most reliable.

We re‑tested the top coding assistants with large repos, long instructions, and strict JSON tasks. Here’s who’s fastest and most reliable.

How we tested

  • Large repo nav: jump to definitions, create safe edits, respect lint rules.
  • Long instructions: multi‑file changes with summaries.
  • Strict JSON tasks: transform data and preserve schema.

Leaders

  • Assistant A — best at repo‑scale edits with minimal errors.
  • Assistant B — fastest latency, slightly weaker on lint adherence.
  • Assistant C — cheapest for continuous usage, strong JSON fidelity.

Buying advice

  • If you work in monorepos, pick the best at cross‑file reasoning.
  • If latency bothers you, pay for the faster tier.
  • For teams, enforce org‑level policies and redact secrets.

Top picks (affiliate-ready)

If you buy through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »